Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  368 / 721 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 368 / 721 Next Page
Page Background

References

• Purkey, W.W., & Novak, J.M. (2015). An introduction to invitational theory. Retrieved from

https://www.invitationaleducation.net/docs/samples/art_intro_to_invitational_theory.pdf

• Rychetnik, L., Frommer, M., Hawe, P., & Shiell, A. (2002). Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions.

Journal

of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56

, 119–127.

• Shaw, D.E., & Siegel, B.L. (2010). Re-adjusting the kaleidoscope: The basic tenants of invitational theory and practices.

Journal

of Invitational Theory and Practice, 16

, 105

112.

• Strydom, F., & Mentz, M. (2012). Weaving the invisible tapestry: Managing diversity through orientation innovation. In B.

Leibowitz, A. Van der Merwe, & S. Van Schalkwyk, (Eds.),

Focus on first-year experience: Perspectives emerging from South

Africa and beyond

(pp. 57

68). Stellenbosch: Sun Media.

• VUT NBT Performance Report (2018).

• VUT Strategy 2015 – 2019 (Version 4.1) (2014).

• Wells, M., Williams, B., Treweek, S., Coyle, J., & Taylor, J. (2012). Intervention description is not enough: Evidence from an in-

depth multiple case study on the untold role and impact of context in randomised controlled trials of seven complex interventions.

Trials Journal, 13

(95), np. Retrieved from

http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/13/1/95