References
• Purkey, W.W., & Novak, J.M. (2015). An introduction to invitational theory. Retrieved from
https://www.invitationaleducation.net/docs/samples/art_intro_to_invitational_theory.pdf• Rychetnik, L., Frommer, M., Hawe, P., & Shiell, A. (2002). Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions.
Journal
of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56
, 119–127.
• Shaw, D.E., & Siegel, B.L. (2010). Re-adjusting the kaleidoscope: The basic tenants of invitational theory and practices.
Journal
of Invitational Theory and Practice, 16
, 105
−
112.
• Strydom, F., & Mentz, M. (2012). Weaving the invisible tapestry: Managing diversity through orientation innovation. In B.
Leibowitz, A. Van der Merwe, & S. Van Schalkwyk, (Eds.),
Focus on first-year experience: Perspectives emerging from South
Africa and beyond
(pp. 57
−
68). Stellenbosch: Sun Media.
• VUT NBT Performance Report (2018).
• VUT Strategy 2015 – 2019 (Version 4.1) (2014).
• Wells, M., Williams, B., Treweek, S., Coyle, J., & Taylor, J. (2012). Intervention description is not enough: Evidence from an in-
depth multiple case study on the untold role and impact of context in randomised controlled trials of seven complex interventions.
Trials Journal, 13
(95), np. Retrieved from
http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/13/1/95




